Total Pageviews

Christopher Luna by Alisha Jucevic for the Columbian

Christopher Luna by Alisha Jucevic for the Columbian
Christopher Luna by Alisha Jucevic for the Columbian
Showing posts with label Partners in Truth and Beauty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Partners in Truth and Beauty. Show all posts

Saturday, April 28, 2012

Partners in Truth and Beauty April 2012: An Interview with Charles Potts



Partners in Truth and Beauty: Charles Potts
interviewed by Christopher Luna

Being from the East Coast, I was initially unaware that Charles Potts was a key figure in Berkeley, CA during the tumultuous 1960s and contributed greatly to West Coast literature through various publications such as Litmus and the Temple Bookstore. He has published many of the best writers in the region, and his two-part memoir Valga Krusa is a heroic recollection of his experiences in California during an especially fertile era in poetic history.
I first encountered Charles at the Burning Word poetry festival on Whidbey Island. I didn’t know what to make of him at first. He dressed like a businessman, and wore a sly smile. But he was very easy to talk to, and straightforward, a quality that not many Northwest denizens share. Over time Charles came to be a trusted friend and mentor.
What I admire about Charles’s poetry is its ability to be profound and erudite while also populist. His poetry is both accessible as well as challenging. You may need to do some additional studying to fully appreciate some of the content in his work, but you will never feel as if you are being talked down to. I can think of no other writer who blends the intellectual and the street so seamlessly.  
I invited Charles to be a featured reader at the Ghost Town Poetry Open Mic, and he immediately charmed the Vancouver poetry community with his dry wit and spot-on Bukowski impression. My reading series is “all ages and uncensored,” and I noticed that the twenty-something poets who brought great energy to the open mic gravitated toward Charles.
Because he had traveled from Walla Walla, Charles stayed at my apartment, and I enjoyed our conversations about poetry and the particular challenges of being an emcee. There was so much to talk about, and we did. I learned a lot from Charles in that short visit, and felt like the proverbial torch had been passed from one emcee to another. As interest in the Ghost Town Poetry open mic continued to grow, I attempted to step up my game, finding ways to make it an even better experience for the new and emerging writers I served.
Not long after his visit, Charles sent us a box filled with copies of his book Kiot, which is a selection of his early poems. I was moved by his generosity. Local poet and artist Alex Birkett later tossed copies of the book to people from the rooftop of a house during a party. This is how the love of poetry is kept alive.

Charles Potts and Christopher Luna
perform together at Bill Shively's place in Newberg, Oregon
August 5, 2011 
Photo by Toni Partington

Although he continues to write and publish, Potts considers himself to be semi-retired from poetry. He recently published Edward Smith’s Truth Has Fallen in the Street, Dan Raphael’s Impulse & Warp: The Selected 20th Century Poems, and an excellent little book by Jeremy Gaulke entitled what the master does not speak of, which also features Gaulke’s haunting illustrations.
According to Dan Raphael, “Charles is an amazing poet/writer (read Kiot and Valga Krusa) and human being. A gun-toting, yoga-posing, formerly crazy, landlord & bibliophile; a man of strong convictions and a wide open, generous heart. I often have doubts about the value of my work, but knowing that Charles likes it, means it must be worthy.”
Jeremy Gaulke told me that working with Charles was a great experience: “Charles Potts has been my friend, publisher, and mentor for almost ten years. His artistic nurturing and generosity provided me with me the resources and environment to learn and grow as a poet and artist in ways I don't think very many young writers get a chance to [enjoy]. Charles gave what I was doing when I was young a sense of purpose and urgency that no one had before. As a poet his intensity and depth is right up my alley.
“We bonded initially over Charles Olson. Some of his work has been compared to Olson, and I don't disagree, but the work that is most compelling to me are his love poems. Not romantic love poems but poems driven by and written on human love. Poems like ‘A Rite to the Body,’ ‘Searching for Mitsuhiro,’ ‘The Hearth’ get at these rudimentary and wonderful human truths, seemingly effortlessly, without perfume or pretension, just love.
            “The first time I met him he walked me around his bookstore summoning poems relating to the conversation from the books scattered around us. I found this was just the way he talks. If there is poetry at hand it always finds its way into the conversation.
            “Charles is important. This country is hard on poets. He is one of the many great writers of the 20/21st centuries whose work and efforts as a publisher have gone under-appreciated. My hope is that more people get access to him. That his passion for and faith in language will rub off on them.”

 Charles Potts reads from his work
at Bill Shively's place in Newberg, Oregon
August 2011
Photograph by Mary Slocum
    
Here is a bio which represents a mere sampling of the work of several decades: Recent Charles Potts books include a reprint of Valga Krusa in two volumes, The Yellow Christ and Laffing Water from Green Panda Press; The Portable Potts and Inside Idaho from West End Press; Kiot: Selected Early Poems 1963-1977, Lost River Mountain, & Slash and Burn with Robert McNealy from Blue Begonia Press; a reprint of Little Lord Shiva: The Berkeley Poems, 1968, from Glass Eye Books; Nature Lovers from Pleasure Boat Studio; and Across the North Pacific from Slough Press in College Station, Texas.
In addition to Potts’s work as a poet, he is a publisher of books by thirty other poets through Tsunami Inc. and Litmus Inc., the editor/publisher of Litmus and The Temple magazines. He recently donated his literary archive to the Merrill-Cazier Library at Utah State University in Logan, Utah, where he frequently goes to teach and read. Potts has been publishing since 1963.
One cannot order Charles’s books, but he invites those interested to contact him at PO Box 100 Walla Walla, WA 99362-0204. According to Charles, “I'm not being snobbish [about my books], they are in cartons in storage. If anybody wants a bunch all they have to do is send me an address and some postage money. This is beyond commerce. I am doing some guerilla marketing of Valga Krusa this spring. A couple dozen young writers in Logan, Utah are reading it for their summer project, and then I will read there in September. The same goes for the books I have published. I still have copies of Klipschutz, Stephen Thomas, the anthology, etc.”
Recently, Charles Potts has turned his attention to raising appaloosas.

Christopher Luna: When and why did you begin raising appaloosas?

Charles Potts: I grew up with appaloosa horses on a ranch in Idaho and sold the ones that belonged to me in 1960 and used the money to pay college expenses. I didn’t own another appaloosa until 2008, forty-eight years later. Appaloosas have wonderful dispositions, are easily trainable, average saddle horses in size, and I am fascinated by their genetics.

The LP mutation which gives them their spots was a one-time event, tens of thousands of years ago. I have a spotted mare who might have been the model for some of the cave paintings in France. How these genes for spots are transferred from one generation to the next is a subject for full length books. I try to cross unrelated lines of foundation appaloosas to deepen and expand the gene pool.

 Fourmile

When did you begin writing?

I began writing in 1962, short stories, and published my first poem in 1963, age 19.

Who were your earliest influences?

Dostoyevsky. I was a student of and was mentored by Edward Dorn starting in 1963.

Can you characterize the differences in the poetry that was being written in the Sixties and the poetry that is being written today? How is the scene different?

The Sixties was a dynamic period for poetry. There were a lot of instructive squabbles going on in poetry, instructive for young poets such as myself. For example, the contentiousness between Philip Whalen and Charles Olson. The dynamic relationship between Edward Dorn and LeRoi Jones. The larger quarrel of the new poetry with the academics, who though dead never seem to quite go away. And the enormous block of original efforts captured in some way by Donald Allen’s The New American Poetry: 1945-1960. This wedge protects to some degree those of us who’ve come after from the ravages of the truly irrelevant “poetry” baled and shipped in America.

If there is a dynamic difference of opinion about poetry in the present time, I don’t know of it. Yes, there is the wasted breath of the new formalists, the continuing timidity of the academic community, [and] the proliferation of electronically transmitted poetry, but it doesn’t seem to add up to much to me.

 Charles Potts in Berkeley, CA 1968

It is possible that the Sixties only seemed dynamic to me because I was immersed in poetry most of the time. When I got married and my immersion was less, the dynamism disappeared. For example, if you get more than twenty feet off a campus, you would be hard pressed to find anybody who has read even one poem by Ezra Pound or Whitman. This culture exists essentially without poetry. Poets actually operate in some small fraction one tenth of one tenth of one percent of this culture. Two orders of magnitude away from actually mattering. How do I know this? I have spent the last thirty years in the business community, the political community, upon which poetry has zero effect and might as well be non-existent.


How did Charles Olson’s call to base the line on the breath rather than syllables in his essay “Projective Verse” change the way you approached writing poetry? How else did his work and ideas impact you?

It would be an extensive challenge to tease out all the pertinent differences between the way I use to feel and respond to Charles Olson and the way those feelings have morphed over the years. I have written about a 16,000 word monograph in six or seven brief essays on Charles Olson, the only poet I will ever write so much about. That may be a clue as to how important he is. (Only one section of my monograph on Olson has been published, in Square One, edited by Jennifer Dorn at the University of Colorado, so if intrepid young publishers feel like pissing a lot of people off, get in touch.)

Olson’s mistakes are more interesting than the successes of all but a half dozen other poets of the 20th century. The thing I remember most vividly of “Projective Verse” was the Instanter idea that poetry has to move rapidly from one thing to another, if not in a straight line, then at least it can’t just sit tight and rest on its laurels.

I have come to believe that the breath and the line connection is so much Irish blather. I think that line length is just as apt to be determined by the width of the paper on which you are writing. And further, the notion that “composition by field” refers only to an 8.5 by 11 sheet of paper is laughably restrictive. I’d rather think of field, as in the field of geography, or the field of alfalfa.
 
How did you meet Charles Bukowski?

I stopped to visit him after several exchanges of letters in 1967 on my way to Mexico. The subject matter of the meeting was to firm up plans I had to publish his book, Poems Written Before Jumping Out of an 8 Story Window. Litmus published that in 1968, the same year he started publishing with Black Sparrow.

What is the greatest misconception about his writing?

I'm temped to say that it is any good. I think Bukowski is a very great poet with a very narrow range. Since I like big wide ranges, only his great poems appeal to me. The rest of it is just typing.


One of your fellow writers from the Berkeley days who does not receive as much attention today as some writers of your generation is Richard Krech. How did you and Richard become friends? Could you tell us why you regard him as an important writer? 

Richard and I became friends through our magazines The Avalanche and Litmus. He visited Seattle and we read together at The Last Exit on Brooklyn. He invited me to Berkeley, where he operated a dynamic reading series at the aptly named Shakespeare and Company Bookstore. Much of Richard Krech’s early career is recited in the Berkeley memoir, Valga Krusa.

As he puts it, after a 25.5 year line break he came back to poetry a few years ago. He is a criminal defense attorney with a Syrinx, a badly damaged back. In his younger days he traveled widely—Africa and Asia. He has a keen sense of the ironic, in such a new poem as “Rumors of Electricity,” which ends with a line like, “in some places, electricity isn’t even a rumor.” His knowing these things about the “3rd” world, where 25% of the entire world’s population lives without electricity, is sobering. How would the electronic puppets of the United States get by without electricity even for half a day, just for starters.

I published a selection of his poetry in the Seventies with Litmus Inc, The Incompleat Works of Richard Krech. There is no padding in his poetry. He has a truly original perspective. His poetry is often terse and very useful, as [is] his work on the Curtilage.

Richard Krech

The following is an encomium that Charles Potts wrote for Richard Krech:

Reading Richard Krech’s At the End of Time is a trip through the ends of the earth, Timbuktu, Kandahar, to the center, The Curtilage, where he has found grace. His calm, rational insistence, “bound by the facts/like a poem is bound/by the physical world” takes us with him, a chest pocket view of the world he records and ennobles in the process. It is great to have Richard Krech back at the center of poetry, after a 25 year line break as a criminal defense attorney. His observations are as pertinent as ever. It took, among other things, Mullah Omar’s blowing up of the Buddha in Afghanistan, “The nihilist mutant theology of Omar…” to nudge his art back to life. From the 13 year old climbing a drain pipe, to the Syrinx afflicted man using his father’s cane, Richard Krech does some heavy lifting of the world up to where we can see it with our own eyes.

When did you first begin publishing other people’s work?

In 1966 Robert Serpa and I published an anthology of four poets, Do You Want to Be in Our Zoo Too? in Pocatello, Idaho. In 1967 I published the first seven issues of Litmus in Seattle. For the record we published a lot of female poets in those days: Zig Knoll, Dawn Statham, Jo Merrill, Karen Waring (Sykes).

How do you decide who to publish?

Well, you publish the best poetry you can get that nobody else is publishing. It helps to read something over a few times. On the other hand, instinct plays a role, too. Usually, if I don’t want to publish something the moment I first read or hear it, it is usually a mistake to talk yourself into it or let someone else talk you into it. Since there is so much writing available already, a poem has to have such confidence in itself that it is knocking on literature’s door; i.e. it will be so well- written and pertinent in its artistic and emotional particulars that it cries out to be re-read, over and over. That is literature.


Truth Has Fallen in the Street is remarkable. Please tell me more about your relationship with Edward Smith. How did you meet?

I am delighted that you can relate to Edward Smith. He enrolled in a class I was teaching at the Free University of Seattle in 1966, and by the third session was presenting not merely publishable work but great poetry. We had a profound friendship. He was born in China and was studying Chinese at [the University of Washington] when we met. His first published work appeared in Litmus in 1967. His loss to the world from bacterial infections related to a bout of the flu when he was only sixty-two years old in 2003 was a severe blow to me, as we had just gotten reacquainted in 2001 after a twenty-five year hiatus. I’m certain he would have written more great poetry, and there is at least one great poem lost to all of us that I heard him read one day in my Belltown apartment: “Cycle for at Least Three: On First Reading Charles Olson’s ‘Maximus at Dogtown.’”

What do you think makes Edward Smith’s work relevant today?

I expect Edward Smith’s work to remain relevant indefinitely. As I say in the introduction to his book, when a poet eschews forms, he or she has to stick to the subject. Smith had a classical education, Harvard, the Army, San Diego High, languages, and music. The artistic and emotional edge are there for use.

Smith’s “Transparent Always” is heartbreaking, critical of capitalism, bureaucracy, and the academy. It seems to ask what remains of us after we are gone. In “Life Ahead,” Smith suggests that love lives on in our poems. Do you think that poets seek immortality through their work, to leave a mark?

Edward was seeking to make a mark on the people most immediately around him. So much of his poetry involves the people in his life. It is not about abstractions, but how people come to grips with the demands made of them. Whether it gets to be immortal or not is up to how many other people can relate to it. The young poet Adam Perry, a fine writer, asked me in an agitated manner how he might become immortal in the literary sense. My reply was that it is simple: You have to write so well that the people can’t forget.

Tell me about your decision to publish Dan Raphael. How long have you known him? How would you assess his contribution to the craft?

I’d felt for a long time that the community needed a selection of Raphael’s work. I think he focuses so strongly on his subjects that they dissolve for him and he re-combines them in ways that are entirely original as far as my reading goes. The title of one of his books is instructive in that regard: Molecular Jam. I think once people unfamiliar with his style and results get familiar with it, his reputation will grow and last for a long time.

Another of your books that really impressed me was Jeremy Gaulke’s what the master does not speak of, a very dark look at our current condition that includes drawings by Gaulke. How did you meet Jeremy and what made you decide to publish him?

Gaulke is from Yakima and he was a student at the Temple School of Poetry in Walla Walla for a couple of years, used to manage the bookstore, and studied with me and Denis Mair. He, of coruse, had some beginnings before that with Dan Peters and Jim Bodeen in Yakima. He came to visit Walla Walla and liked the way it was put together, I guess. He too is original, and reasonably difficult in his later work, difficult that is for people who are used to the “Mr. Rogers School of Poetry” to appreciate.

Please tell me more about The Temple.

If by The Temple, you mean the magazine, it is in cold storage, last issue published in 2002, i.e. ten years ago. If by Temple you mean the building, it is now host to a dessert factory called The Colville Street Patisserie, and a vegan cafe called The Garden, and several other businesses.

How long did the Temple Bookstore operate?

The Temple bookstore was opened with a flourish with a reading by Klipschutz in 2002, and was open until 2005.

Charles Potts reads from his work
at Bill Shively's place in Newberg, Oregon
August 2011 
Photograph by Mary Slocum

What’s next for you? Have you been writing? Reading? Teaching?

I write all the time in a desultory fashion, rarely finish anything and am usually dissatisfied with it even if I do. I would like to think that if something I write isn’t at least as good as some of the best of the earlier work, then why bother publishing it. I have aspirations for a loosely organized group of poems with the subject matter of my horses, tentatively called The Stable Boy at Blue Creek. I’d guess there’s about an even chance I will never finish it.

I am not a fan of the crisis poetry is in, and has been for several hundred years, apparently. I don’t read much—magazines, some poetry.

I donated my literary archive to Utah State University in Logan, Utah, to the Merrill-Cazier Library there. The library bought my personal papers. For reasons I cannot explain, this library wound up with the materials from a boatload of materials that had been on display in New York. The theme of that display was "A Secret Location on the Lower East Side." I have not examined this collection but apparently it was large, and attempted to gather all the mimeo and other stuff from the 50s 60s 70s, etc: the American Advance guard in literature. So they have a good selection of contemporary materials, and it promises to grow.

I occasionally go there to read poems or talk about the archive (approximately 140 cartons of books, magazines, correspondence, videos, etc.) and consult with faculty and students. I taught a master class there in September 2011, for instance. It’s entirely possible that a reasonably large group of great poets may converge on USU at some point in the future, if financing can be reckoned with.

What is the single most important piece of advice that you could give someone who is just beginning to write poetry?

Don’t do it unless you absolutely have to. Poetry is a lousy career move. You have to be inspired, dedicated, and totally committed.
____________________________________________________________________________

Please take a look at the previous interviews in Christopher Luna’s ongoing series, Partners In Truth and Beauty:

Derek Fenner, writer, artist and co-founder of Bootstrap Productions:
http://christopherluna-poetry.blogspot.com/2010/02/work-february-2010-interview-with-derek.html

Ryan Gallagher, Bootstrap co-founder and Catullus translator:
http://christopherluna-poetry.blogspot.com/2010/04/work-april-2010-interview-with-ryan.html

Sage Cohen, author of Writing the Life Poetic and The Productive Writer:
http://christopherluna-poetry.blogspot.com/2011/03/partners-in-truth-and-beauty-march-2011.html

Sean Patrick Hill, poet and author of The Imagined Field and Interstitial: http://christopherluna-poetry.blogspot.com/2011/09/partners-in-truth-and-beauty-september.html

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Partners In Truth and Beauty September 2011: An Interview with Sean Patrick Hill, author of The Imagined Field and Interstitial

“Poetry, for me, is a kind of yoga, a discipline, a practice of awareness. It involves, for me, scrutiny, meditation, arguing.”

    
Partners in Truth and Beauty: Sean Patrick Hill
interviewed by Christopher Luna

I know few people as dedicated to the craft of poetry as Sean Patrick Hill. Since we first became acquainted, he has challenged me and the other writers around him to learn more, push harder, think deeper.

Hill grew up in upstate New York before moving to Oregon, where he lived for many years before settling in Kentucky with his wife, Erynn, and their daughter, Teagan. Sean has earned degrees from the University of Buffalo and Portland State University, and is currently a graduate student at Warren Wilson College. He has been the recipient of fellowships to the Vermont Studio Center and Montana Artists Refuge. His poetry and reviews have appeared in Rain Taxi, Bookslut, Redactions, Gulf Coast, and the Oregonian. You can find out more about him and his work at The Imagined Field

Sean Patrick Hill’s poetry recovers the forgotten landscape of our collective history as it bears witness to the fall of the American empire. He wanders the ruins as a solitary figure, perhaps the last of us, observing the desolation as he longs for a past that preceded even his birth. White is a common color throughout The Imagined Field (Paper Kite Press, 2010), evoking not clarity but the confusion of snowblindness. Hill inventories our broken promises, laments our failed relationships and faulty memories. He takes us to task for failing to value the land as well as the people who reside upon it.


Interstitial (BlazeVOX [books], 2011) is filled with melancholic, dream-like observation of small towns including his hometown of Elmira, New York. Poems such as “A Road We Cannot Travel Without Damaging” (Interstitial, page 33) wrestle with the legacy of manhood.

A Road We Cannot Travel Without Damaging

Flagstone makes as good a paving stone as token of a grave.

Everything here is stone—the ruined abbey.
The megalithic tombs worked by men like us.

Rather, the stone works us.

Our ancestors hardly filled their clothes.
Your mother cooked potatoes; your father worked
nights in a glass factory.

You married young and had a stranger for a son,
I know.

It is the palace of our blood.
I too have been proud of my vicious hands.

Hill’s poetry is the inner dialogue of a man in search of himself, and his country’s broken promise. The book is a devastating portrayal of failed marriages and the consequences of unregulated capitalism. 


The poet’s voice resembles the inner monologue of the seeker, hoping to recover what has been lost, and fearful that it may be too late. Poems like “Down in the Flood” (The Imagined Field, page 48) represent an endless search, and a tireless desire to discover the answers to the big questions. The journey is marked by rich imagery and precise, imaginative phrasing that will linger long after you’ve finished reading. Spend some time with Sean Patrick Hill’s work, and you will come to understand that we are fortunate to have him as a guide.


Is The Imagined Field inspired by Robert Duncan's Opening of the Field? If so, what does that book means to you? How has it informed your writing?

There are a lot of things behind the title, Duncan being part of that, yes. As a matter of fact, it is you yourself who first loaned me the book and turned me onto Olson. So really, the title is inspired more by Olson's essay on Projective Verse. I had that idea in mind (and I had read [Olson’s] "The Kingfisher" a number of times), but Duncan is also working out the same ideas.

But James Galvin is there too: I love the title of his first book, Imaginary Timber. The idea of imagination, I think, is a concern in the book, if not one of its central themes. A lot of the poems are either directly from the imagination or else grappling with it, as Stevens was. Stevens, in fact, is also evoked by the title; the line "The imagined pine, the imagined jay" from "The Man with the Blue Guitar" haunts the book, as well. But Olson's ideas about, especially, the breath in relation to the line are, of course, dead on for me.

Coin-Op Binoculars
from The Imagined Field, page 57

In this room, some odd dollars a night, shades drawn,
I am invisible.

The television, a mute.

What I want to determine is how I can be comfortable
in this skin.

There’s been many things said about stones—
that they can’t laugh.
That they are without pity.

I’m too tired to right.

You see what I mean…

Each room has its display case of attractions.
The factory tours, the factory outlets.
A thousand ways to earn rewards, free nights…

Lobbies are all the same: a case of maps to all things
irrelevant. Here’s where to park. Here’s where to sleep.

I want the one that says where to sit by Lake Champlain
and watch the sun
drag the sky into the Adirondacks.

A quarter for the view in this antique machine.

How has poetry helped you to “determine how I can be comfortable in your own skin,” as you write in “Coin-Op Binoculars”?

Oddly, I had to go back to that poem to see exactly what I was thinking of; it’s been a while since I thought of that poem. But one thing to acknowledge is what that poem is, what it is a part of, which is a long sequence I wrote while I was driving through Vermont, doing job interviews, staying in motels. At the time, life was unstable. I had no full-time job. I didn’t know where I was going to end up. I had dreams of living in a place like Vermont. In short, I was not comfortable in my own skin.

First, I don’t know if I am comfortable in my own skin, even now. I doubt it. So I keep writing. I was thinking about this, and I remembered Wallace Stevens saying “poetry is the philosopher’s art,” or something to that effect. Some poets vehemently disagree with any sort of marriage between poetry and philosophy, but for me, poetry is part of a pragmatic, practical philosophy, in that I’m trying to write my way into a philosophy of living. To put it simply, many of my poems simply ask, “How am I to live?” The longer sequence White River Junction, of which “Coin-Op Binoculars” is a part, endeavors to answer that question. In a way it does, but I’m still not satisfied.

So many of my newer poems, especially, become rhetorical, arguing for a way of looking at life that is sane. I’m trying to articulate to myself, even more than an abstract reader, that I can carry on. I’m trying to rewrite the last stanza of Ammons’ "Gravelly Run" for myself, I suppose.

But, of course, you know how it is: I can read an old poem and get a sense of “Yes, I remember making this discovery, this insight,” and the poem’s language contains, incredibly, that feeling, but at the same time I’m compelled to move forward. Poetry, for me, is a kind of yoga, a discipline, a practice of awareness. It involves, for me, scrutiny, meditation, arguing.

Who are you reading these days? Is there anyone who you would like to insist that others read?

Well, being enrolled now in the Warren Wilson College program, I’m reading a lot, both poetry and criticism. One person I’ve been reading and been amazed by is Randall Jarrell; consequently, he is one I’d insist others read. He’s fabulous, very contemporary, too, especially when he gets to talking about the media, you can see that even in the 1950’s and 60’s, he understood where the whole television trap was headed. But he’s also a close reader; his essays on Frost and Williams, to name a few, are enlightening.

In poetry itself, I’ve been reading James Dickey, and I’m quite taken by him. I’ve also been interested in August Kleinzahler and Charlie Smith. I’ve even gone back to Dylan Thomas. And I reread Sylvia Plath who, I realize, is far more of an influence than I’ve ever given credit to--she may be my biggest influence. I suspect this is so. Tonight I read Flannery O’ Connor, “A Good Man is Hard to Find.” I also faithfully read Harper’s every month--I’ve been subscribing for years, and it informs my sensibility consistently.

Did Richard Hugo’s essay on the triggering town influence the writing of these poems in any way?

Oh, yes. In fact, many poems from The Imagined Field were written when I was at the Montana Artists Refuge, pretty much in Hugo territory, on his home ground. “The Hours,” “Don’t Bother Asking,” and some other published poems were written there, and I was rereading “The Triggering Town” during my residency there. That stay in Montana, only two weeks, did more for my poetry than the nearly twenty years before it. I really did take his ideas in, and I’ve kept them. Many other poems in both books respond to his “tour guide” aesthetic, especially when, after Montana, I did a few more residencies: out by Hell’s Canyon, in the Oregon Coast Range, Vermont. I’d find myself in new places, and I would try to find my world in them. In fact, I originally had slated a quote from that Hugo essay for the book, but I eventually decided against it. I figured it was too obvious a reference. It is very perceptive of you to notice. I think it’s safe to say that this single essay is one of my most important points of reference.

What other writers do you look to for inspiration and guidance?

Who do I turn to in poetry for wisdom? This is a list that remains pretty steady, but one I keep returning to is James Galvin, especially those first four books as collected in Resurrection Update. An incredible book, and one I have to patiently and pointedly keep from imitating. James Wright, of course. I also find a great deal of power in Jack Gilbert, as I do in Robert Bly, or Rilke. Whitman has always been a foundation for my sense of hope, as has Wordsworth and Emerson. William Stafford is probably the single most inspiring poet I know of, and I’ve read him for years. Of course, they inspire and guide not only my sense of life, my life, but also the writing which is my life, as well.

When This Glacier Burns
from Interstitial, page 22

you’ll know there’s always something stem cells won’t reveal.
Even the imagination can play the tyrant.
Building monuments to itself with its arm saluting…

salute, solution. Salud. Is this the root of your inner
gorilla? Is this the latex mask you pull over your mouth?
The costumes my father constructed for me lasted

longer than he did as a father. There’s your animal.
There’s your natural history. Of course I like zoos, but I also
like the idea of clouds climbing mountains. The milk river a result

of something dying on high. An eroding slope. Brutal spade.
 
Tell me about the process of writing “When This Glacier Burns.” How did it begin?

In Interstitial, there’s a number of these poems, “When Such-and-such Burns,” and I call them--though not in the book--The Fire Sermons. They were all written in the same fashion. I started with one, just absolutely raging onto paper, venting. The first poem fell into the ten-line structure they all follow, three tercets and a single line coda. When I saw the potential, I thought I had found a form I could work in, and so I did.
                                                                  
“When this Glacier Burns” remains, as they all do, its own entity. Actually, this poem is pointed at a particular contemporary poet, and it’s more or less making fun of that poet. It’s a jeremiad, in that sense. How was the poem written? In a mad rush. I allowed myself absolute freedom to say whatever the hell I wanted. I don’t always do that, though I’m trying to get better at it. Self-editing has been a problem for years, an unfortunate legacy of workshopping, I think. Also thinking too much, over-learning, all the stuff Pound said one must forget. So, this is how I unlearned it, at least in part.

Did you intend to write about your father? Did the first line come first, or later?

My father is omnipresent in my poetry, and all of a sudden there he was. I was thinking, during the writing, of a poem I had read that involved, if I remember right, a gorilla costume. From there, it was all association, and then there was my father. The rest of [“When This Glacier Burns”] launches from that. As you can probably tell, I was thinking of my father quite a bit in the course of these first two books. But at the outset, it was not about him.

I should say, too, that the poems are written exactly as they appear, start to finish, very little editing. Generally, if a poem is terrible to me, and feels beyond fixing, I abandon it. I suppose I’m ruthless in this regard. I’m reminded of the golden eagles nesting along the cliffs of Britain; there are two birds hatched in the nest, but the parents only feed the strongest one. The other they toss out when it starves. That’s how I write, especially when I’m utterly busy. This is the one interpretation of Ginsberg’s "first thought, best thought" I take away: the poem that comes forcefully, and nearly fully formed, I know if it’s a keeper.

Interstitial
page 32

That summer I went to the mountain, a fire smoldered beneath Ghost Ridge.
I drove the dirt road past abandoned wagon tracks, past Inspiration Point.
I know there are many places with that name.
But this overlooked the branch that tore the mountain from its roots.
That washed clean the road and carried off the bridge.
By day I climbed into the cinder fields to the shelter on Cooper Spur.
Its door was covered by a heavy black fabric that could not keep deer flies out.
I climbed above the smoke to where I could hear ice crack like gunfire.
That night I slept in the hemlocks, moonlight shining on the glaciers.
I went out when I heard horned owls and tracked them with my flashlight.
Two men circumambulating the mountain sat on a knoll above the campground.
They smoked dope; I could smell it.
The next day I left money in the padlocked, iron post.
I drove down from the peak, the sun bright red.
Later I saw the fire on the news: photographs of the burning mountain.
Point is it burned, of course, close to where I slept.
I won’t go so far as to say I was lucky, but I will say this.
Where I sleep now there is no mountain, no dirt road, and no fire.

The poem “Interstitial” demonstrates the power of gratitude. Tell us more about how this simple but essential practice has affected your life and work.

That’s an interesting way to look at it because I often find myself being ungrateful for the things I have in life. Bad habit, I suppose. To mention Stevens again, I remember Harold Bloom’s writing about him, saying how Stevens felt “grateful” to have achieved a poem, especially after that long silence between his first two books. For me, as for anyone I’m sure, just receiving a poem is enough to make me feel gratitude that I have been found worthy by the muse at least once more.

What I’d really like to do is to write about gratitude, to write about the things I should be thankful for, to try to hold them in place. But I’m such a complainer, I harbor such negativity that it’s difficult to have faith in the positive, and it’s especially difficult to have faith in writing about good things without the poem seeming affected, cliche, ridiculous.

I’ve often said that love poems are the hardest to write, yet I continue to try. It works, sometimes. I also try to write about my daughter, but I feel like I carry such a persistent, nagging fear that I’ll write something unworthy of her, that maybe I don’t. Or worse, it can all be about attention: I simply need to focus on her, unswervingly. Yet, I’m selfish, as many around me know.

Here’s what I’ve learned, though: what you write about ends up being what you preserve. For me, it is the struggle I write about. The doubt, the fear, the battling. I think this is why Dante hangs around me, and that’s certainly why I used his first tercet from Inferno as the start of The Imagined Field. The greatest gratitude is just to get through these terrors, this self-doubt, this spiritual crisis, and get some meaning from it, some blood from a stone, and enshrine it in a poem that I cherish because it speaks the truth. It makes, to some degree, the whole struggle worth it.

Many of the poems in Interstitial feel like a tour of the ruins of the American landscape. What is your opinion of where we are and where we might be headed?   

Yes, I am fascinated by ruins. Again, this brings up the Triggering Town: the ruins are within myself, and I project them onto the imaginative landscape, and that is “the imagined field.” I’m fascinated by the American ruins, which happened so quickly. The Industrial Age declined so quickly, and now we have these weed-ridden tracks, empty warehouses, decrepit steelmills along Lake Erie, and so on. I find it both frightening and lovely. To me, it’s the human condition.

I have to admit, at least in terms of America, I have little faith in where we are going. I only see us as going down. I carry Gary Snyder’s "For the Children" in my head: “the steep climb / of everything, going up / as we all / go down.”

Right now, I’m in a position from which I feel what many Americans are going through: I have part-time jobs, no health care, a car that is literally going to pieces, without which I cannot get to any job, living in a house with virtually no insulation and winter a-coming. Money is a constant worry. I’m in debt to my ears, and I’ve been looking for full time work for years. All the poems from my books speak directly to this.

 Sean Patrick Hill with his daughter Teagan

Has becoming a father changed your attitude about such matters?

Being a father only heightens this awareness. And I mean awareness; I feel the presence of disaster, a void, where a single accident can slip us into bankruptcy, into ruin. This scares me. Still, we have things good. We can, at least, afford good food for our daughter. We are never without money, even though we have come perilously close. My daughter makes me laugh. She’s so smart, so bright, she loves reading, very imaginative. If there is hope for the future, even if it’s only my future, it’s her.

In the end, my wife and I are lucky to be educated, and to be able to continue that education. Tonight, I pulled the broken serpentine belt from my car, and the neighbor helped me recharge the battery and get the shorted-out window back up before it rained. People go through worse, yet I know what they feel, I think. Because I feel that panic often. I worry about not providing for my daughter, so it’s no surprise that my poems, the ones I’m now writing for my MFA (which seems ironic to say, privileged and middle-class, though I’m certainly not all that) are rather condemning of the economic situation. I’m writing from the perspective of the underemployed, the marginalized.

Down in the Flood
from The Imagined Field, page 48

My father keeps his own small house with a phone
he rarely touches.

When I tell him I want to come home
he says, I don’t know what you think you'll find here
after all these years.

But one summer, on the mudflats,
I unearthed a parking meter from his town,
twenty miles upriver.

No matter how I shook it,
its face registered nothing but a thin red flag
of violation.

My mother says, You’re too much like your father--
I don't know what you expect.

Let me put it this way:
I always wondered what else got buried.

Describe your thinking during the time period during which you wrote these poems. How has it changed since?

My main thinking during these poems has been, “What the hell am I going to do?” It’s been pure frustration: with the job search, with loneliness, with alienation, with marriage problems, with money problems. Robert Frost has been a larger influence of late, and especially during these poems, simply for his grim, stoic view of life. I’m more or less middle-aged now, and where am I? Will I ever be stable? Secure? I’m having my doubts. It’s amazing to me, simply amazing, how easy life was only ten years ago. Then the recession, which has gone on and on. The only difference between this and the Great Depression is that we have television. No Dust Bowl, but rather flood upon flood, storm after storm. New Orleans under water: an American city virtually destroyed! Neverending wars, political corruption, media circuses, and lies and more lies, and I’m just trying to get a job and maybe someday own a house. How can this not power poetry? Why do I not see more writing dealing with the bare, unadorned issue at stake?

My thinking has only deepened. I look at America in light of Rome, Carthage, the empires of dust. It’s our turn. It’s hard to admit we may be on the permanent decline now, but I fear the peak is passed, the circuit rounded. Things are only going to get fiercer, and where will each of us be? What will the struggles be? Being modern, with microwave ovens, has nothing to do with the decline of a civilization. Technology won’t save us from ourselves. I worry for my daughter, and I am incredulous as to why the public conversation is so negligent of the facts of our situation.

If anything, I am strengthened in my resolve to find a way to write a poetry that just tells it like it is: this is the situation on the ground, no romanticism of poverty, no bootstraps pulled to the crotch, just the undeniable fact that people are jobless, angry, desperate, despairing. No amount of media spin can change that, unless it is in our perspective. Poetry, my poetry, has to act against that, has to insist on the truth of the matter, and give voice not to generalized “people”--I can’t accomplish that pretense--but rather to speak for myself, who is decidedly in the position of this desperation. Only in this way can I claim to speak on anyone’s behalf, those in the same boat.

Assess your experience of the Portland poetry scene. How is Kentucky different, and what do you like about it?

Man, Portland had so much going on, but in the end I just couldn’t give myself up to attending every reading and reading every journal. I’ve always been suspect of poetry communities, groups, schools, cliques. I don’t trust them. But then, I’m somewhat of a misanthrope anyway. I like to be with friends, not to be a part of a scene. My friends know this. I guess I’m a romantic, living the lie of the lone poet, the rebel, all that. But there is some truth in the simple, Confucian idea of working in obscurity. At first I was engaged, but I grew disenchanted with the whole scene thing. I’d rather sit in the backyard with a beer, look at the moon, listen to crickets.

On the other hand, when I look at, say, the Vancouver readings, I see the people and audience there as just very fine, very ordinary, very rich people. Those are the people I feel comfortable with, the kind of people I’ve always known. Not to be crass, but the hipsterism of everything about Portland--including poetry--just sickened me, frankly. It wearied me. So I stayed home, or went hiking with my friend Andy, and he and I would walk the Columbia Gorge, talking life, philosophy, literature. With him, we might as well have been Tu Fu and Li Po, wandering the mountains. I like that simplicity.

Kentucky is very different. Still, I’ve involved myself. I wrote a bit for the Louisville weekly, the LEO, even doing a cover story about the literary community here. It went over well, drew a lot of response. I’ve met other writers, publishers, organizers. I’ve gone to the InKY readings, the Sarabande series. I’ve met Adam Day, Kyle Thompson, Nickole Brown, and others. I’ve done a few readings myself. Still, I tend to keep to myself now. I have a family that needs me around, there’s work I have to do, so going out is a luxury.

What I like about Kentucky the most is the Red River Gorge. Wendell Berry wrote a great book about it, The Unforseen Wilderness, which I read prior to hiking out there. As far as writing goes, I’m working on a trail guide for the Gorge, and that’s a writing I’m interested in now. I enjoy it as much as poetry.

So I should take a moment to say that Kentucky has, like Montana, triggered an immense change in me. After working in an urban high school, struggling in adjunct jobs, commuting for hours, and trying to keep a writing career afloat, things have been tiring. My writing has thrived on the conflict and tension. I think I’m writing better than I ever have now, and I’m grateful for that. Some of the poems in Interstitial--”Crossing Idaho” or “Poem” or “The Indian Pits on Wind Mountain” and others--were actually written here in the Bluegrass State, and couldn’t have been written anywhere else. Kentucky has been slow to get into me, to root in my heart, but it’s building itself a nest. I’m glad, sometimes, for the stress, for the Sturm und Drang. Without it, I wouldn’t be able to speak from this vantage, to say what needs to be said.

Utah
Published in The Diagram 11.2

From where I stand, I could kill the wolves with sleep.

Could pull highway roses to dust and hope that hope abides.

But what.

But water stale as cake in boxes often feeds rootless weeds and I am rootless, too.

But nothing, ghost, nothing.

The bear came, snorted, scared the piss out of me at night while I almost slept.

I drove two days to find her.

I gathered sunflowers from the median and kept them in water.

I’m halfway to Denver by morning.

There’s enough of me to light a few twigs, sometime, if necessary.

It’s not like the nights are colder than the worst of winter.

But this late in the game your game face is not all that’s found wanting.

It’s anything you make, anything you say, anything you trouble under the sky.

____________________

If you enjoyed this interview, please take a look at the previous articles in Christopher Luna’s ongoing series, Partners In Truth and Beauty:

Derek Fenner, writer, artist and co-founder of Bootstrap Productions
Ryan Gallagher, Bootstrap co-founder and Catullus translator
Sage Cohen, author of Writing the Life Poetic and The Productive Writer